In 2009 the average, American household spent $2,200 annually on energy; and approximately half of that money was for heating and cooling. However, washing clothes in cold water saves money because up to 90% of the cost of washing clothes comes from heating water. Changing the thermostat by a degree for 8 hours a day – while homeowners are at work or asleep – saves 2% on heating or cooling. Sealing electric outlets in exterior walls with inexpensive foam gaskets keeps heated or cooled air from leaking out. It seems being energetic saves energy.

California will be the first state to save energy by imposing energy efficiency standards for televisions. As televisions increased in size, residential energy use attributed to televisions increased from 3%-4% in the 1990’s to 8%-10% in 2008. If nothing was done, the percentage was expected to reach 18% by 2023. As of January 2011, however, televisions 58 inches and smaller must consume 33% less electricity. By 2013 they must consume 49% less. Considering these new energy standards are expected to save California consumers $1 billion annually, the California Energy Commission’s unanimous vote put vision into television.

New vision is responsible for getting more natural gas from shale. Because of a combination of horizontal drilling and water fracturing (water and sand forced into rock at high pressure to open tiny cracks), U.S. natural gas reserves are 35% higher than previously thought. For example, a shale formation from New York to West Virginia is believed to hold 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas – equal to 80 billion barrels of oil. Natural gas is cheaper than oil and produces less carbon dioxide than coal, but it is still a fossil fuel. Thus it’s being thought of as a transition fuel – not as energy’s last gas-p.

What the U.S. needs is sustainable fuel and E. coli can provide it. The same microbe in the news for tainting food can produce biodiesel fuel. Scientists at a San Francisco-based company have genetically engineered E. coli to excrete biodiesel. Because the excreted fatty acids are almost like conventional hydrocarbon fuels, delivering this new fuel to consumers wouldn’t require any changes from the present system of delivering gas. Large scale commercialization is expected by 2013 at a competitive price with oil at $40-$50 a barrel. In reshaping the world’s fuel supply efficient, economical, sustainable E. coli could be a driving force.

Watch the video related to vision biodiesel

Introducing the newest member of Common Vision’s fleet.

Help answer the question about vision biodiesel

About Author

Knight Pierce Hirst -
About the Author:

Knight Pierce Hirst has written for television, newspapers and greeting cards. Now she writes a 400-word blog three times a week. KNIGHT WATCH, a second look at what makes life interesting, takes only seconds to read at http://knightwatch.typepad.com

Who’s Energetic About Saving Energy? is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

Earthpump, Now Dubbed, The Deregulation Pump

 Deregulation of the oil downstream sector would contribute positively to the development of the sector, initially there will be price increase as feared but eventually, there will be competition for sales among the various firms that will eventually force down prices to attract customers which will also see a drop in fuel scarcity in the country.

 Deregulation is the way forward for the oil sector as experience has shown that when a sector of the economy is taken away from the government’s control, it tends to do better, and our company Earthslink Communications, the global sales and marketing company is introducing The Earthpump as “The Deregulation Pump” as a way to ease the pains of the initial high cost of fuel in the country,

 The Deregulation Pump is designed to eradicate fuel spillage and therefore conserve fuel for our customers, The Deregulation Pump is designed to transfer fuel, diesel, kerosene from one location to the other, at the push of a button.

The Deregulation Pump which is battery operated pump will transfer diesel in minutes, transfer petrol in seconds, dry out ponds in a flash, the pump which boasts of a wide range of international certifications also has the Standard Organisation of Nigeria’s Certification.

Earthslink Communications, the company behind The Deregulation Pump, is currently providing a wide range of sales solutions using an effective research and development led sales and marketing initiative guaranteed to maximise profits. Sales and marketing remains at the heart of our company, we have over the years picked up invaluable experience in sales, market research, advertising, business and new media. Earthslink’s strategic active involvement approach has been developed to provide a logical, considered process to enable us to work with you in identifying and effecting changes that will result in sales performance improvements.

 Earthslink Communications is a fresh, innovative and enthusiastic sales and marketing company formed by experienced industry professionals who have over the years effectively used research and development initiatives and the broadcast medium to create awareness of a wide variety of issues in the global community, combining creativity with cutting edge technology, our aim is to offer the very highest quality service utilizing the highest quality sales solutions and methodologies.

Watch the video related to Fuel Pump

CLICK HIGH QUALITY WHEN WATCHING! The Mischief crew will be attending the 7th Annual HyperFest on June 21st in Summit Point, WV. Dado has had problems with his M3 at every HyperFest that it’s competed in. Dado just installed another new motor 2 weeks ago. Can Dado break the HyperFest curse this year? Hyper-Fest.com BMW M3 Mods: Custom S50 motor bored to 3.2 Pauter rods chromoly rods Low Compression Arias Pistons Turbo Spec Cams Hi performance valve springs Knife edged crank Calico coated crank bearings Calico coated rod bearings .080 Cometic multi layered steel head gasket Stage 3 1400 CFM Intercooler Turbonetics Stage 3 Hybrid Turbo: 60-1 compressor Electromotive TEC3 engine management. Dual electric 10″ fans Heat Wrapped exhaust manifold and piping HKS Racing Bypass Valve HKS Super Sequential blow off valve Greddy Boost Controller Greddy Turbo Timer Zionsville Aluminum radiator SPA Technique Oil cooler with braided lines Euro E36 oil filter housing with outlets for oil cooler Custom 3 inch side exhaust Custom 3.5″ Low Level Air Intake Fuel starvation kit stage 2 (secondary fuel pump) Main fuel pump welbro 255 Also, I include a quick video I made of the 6 Speed Online drive we did from Tyson’s Corner, VA to Old Dominion Speedway on Sunday (5.18.08) to watch Dado drift. This is the type of video that Mischief Alliance members at Mischief.tv get to see once a week. Scenes from this video will be featured in the upcoming “Mischief 7: Joy Ride” movie scheduled for a Summer <b>…</b>

Help answer the question about Fuel Pump

Most people are telling me to throw a electric fuel pump with a fuel line running straight to the carb. When I drop some fuel in the carb, it starts right up.

If I don't put a electric fuel pump on there, is fixing the above problem a heavy job? And if I want to fix it, who has the parts?

About Author

Folasele Akintemi -
About the Author:

Fola Akintemi is the Managing Director at Earthslink Communications

Earthpump Now The New Deregulation Pump is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

Aarkstore announce a new report “The Future of the South and Central America Oil Market, Forecasts and Trends to 2015 – Huge Offshore Finds Drive Investment Opportunities” through its vast collection of market research report.

Summary

“The Future of the South and Central America Oil Market, Forecasts and Trends to 2015 – Huge Offshore Finds Drive Investment Opportunities” The study, which is an offering from the company’s Energy Research Group, provides an in-depth analysis of the crude oil market in South and Central America and highlights the various concerns, shifting trends and major players in the region. The report provides forecasts for the Exploration and Production (E&P) industry, crude oil pipeline industry, crude oil storage industry, refining industry and crude oil consumption in South and Central America to 2015. The report also provides segmental forecasts of the crude oil market in South and Central America and highlights the major countries in the region. The report provides in-depth analysis of the key trends and challenges in the crude oil market in the region. An analysis of the competitive scenario and capital expenditure analysis for the region are also provided for each of the market segments.

The report is built using the data and information sourced from proprietary databases, primary and secondary research and in-house analysis by team of industry experts.

Scope

The report provides in-depth analysis on the major factors affecting the oil field services industry. Its scope includes:

• An overview of the South and Central American oil industry covering the complete value chain of the oil industry. This include exploration and production (E&P), crude oil pipeline, oil storage, refining, and crude oil consumption.

• Key countries covered include Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Chile, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Ecuador and Bolivia

• An analysis of the historical trends and forecasts to 2015.

• Identification of the major discoveries and expansion plans in the region.

• An analysis of the demand and supply scenario of crude oil to 2015.

• An analysis of the opportunities and challenges in the South and Central American oil industry.

• An analysis of the competitive scenario in the South and Central American oil industry. Key companies covered include Pemex, Transpetro S.A, PDVSA, Repsol, Perenco, Petrobras, Ecopetrol

Reasons to buy

The report will enhance your decision making capability. It will allow you to:

• Develop business strategies with the help of specific insights about the crude oil industry in South and Central America, including E&P, pipelines, and the storage and refining sectors.

• Identify opportunities and challenges in the South and Central American crude oil industry.

• Understand the market positioning of the companies operating through the value chain in the crude oil industry in South and Central America.

• Increase future revenues and profitability with the help of insights into the future opportunities and critical success factors in the South and Central American crude oil industry.

• Benchmark your operations and strategies against the major players in the crude oil industry in South and Central America.

For more information, please visit:

http://www.aarkstore.com/reports/The-Future-of-the-South-and-Central-America-Oil-Market-Forecasts-and-Trends-to-2015-Huge-Offshore-Finds-Drive-Investment-Opportunities-45416.html

Or email us at press@aarkstore.com or call +919272852585

Aarkstore Enterprise

Tel : +912227453309

Mobile No: +919272852585

Email : contact@aarkstore.com

Website : http://www.aarkstore.com

Blog: http://blogs.aarkstore.com/

Follow us on twitter: http://twitter.com/aarkstoredotcom

Watch the video related to biodiesel business plan

The Local Business Movement Panel at the Net Impact Club’s Sustainability Symposium at the Appalachian State University Broyhill Inn and Conference Center on April 21, 2010. *** The Panelists: *** Andy is a non-traditional ASU student studying local government and public policy, and has been involved in local Boone issues for the past several years. He currently serves as a resident member of the Boone Board of Adjustment, as a member of the Academic Policies and Procedures Committee at ASU and as President of the Watauga County Young Democrats. *** Franya Hutchins serves as an advocate for local farmers in her role as coordinator of the multi-farm project High Country Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). She lives at Maverick Farms in Valle Crucis, a non-profit center for food and farming that facilitates the High Country CSA. Born and raised in Watauga County, NC, Ms. Hutchins works in the local food movement in an effort to expand, diversify, and strengthen the local economy. She also serves at Appalachian State University as Research Assistant for the ASU Wine Initiative. *** Debi Golembieski, of Green Mother Goods, works with two other moms, Meredith Anders and Christie Fredenburg, juggling children and business to run Green Mother Goods ~ a family friendly eco-store in Boone. The store carries a wide variety of sustainable and sweatshop-free/fair-trade products like eco-friendly apparel, school supplies, toys and baby items, global handcrafts, and a growing <b>…</b>

Help answer the question about biodiesel business plan

About Author

Aarkstore Enterprise -
About the Author:

Aarkstore Enterprise is a leading provider of business and financial information and solutions worldwide. We specialize in providing online market business information on market research reports, books, magazines, conference at competitive prices, and strive to provide excellent and innovative service to our customers. Our customers include more than 700 leading financial institutions, professional service firms, consulting, law and accounting firms and other corporations throughout the world.

Aarkstore Enterprise–The Future of the South and Central America Oil Market, Forecasts and Trends to 2015 – Huge Offshore Finds Drive Investment Oppo is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

Chemistry

Structure of ethanol molecule. All bonds are single bonds

Glucose (a simple sugar) is created in the plant by photosynthesis.

6 CO2 + 6 H2O + light C6H12O6 + 6 O2

During ethanol fermentation, glucose is decomposed into ethanol and carbon dioxide.

C6H12O6 2 C2H5OH+ 2 CO2 + heat

During combustion ethanol reacts with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide, water, and heat:

C2H5OH + 3 O2 2 CO2 + 3 H2O + heat

After doubling the combustion reaction because two molecules of ethanol are produced for each glucose molecule, and adding all three reactions together, there are equal numbers of each type of molecule on each side of the equation, and the net reaction for the overall production and consumption of ethanol is just:

light heat

The heat of the combustion of ethanol is used to drive the piston in the engine by expanding heated gases. It can be said that sunlight is used to run the engine.

Glucose itself is not the only substance in the plant that is fermented. The simple sugar fructose also undergoes fermentation. Three other compounds in the plant can be fermented after breaking them up by hydrolysis into the glucose or fructose molecules that compose them. Starch and cellulose are molecules that are strings of glucose molecules, and sucrose (ordinary table sugar) is a molecule of glucose bonded to a molecule of fructose. The energy to create fructose in the plant ultimately comes from the metabolism of glucose created by photosynthesis, and so sunlight also provides the energy generated by the fermentation of these other molecules.

Ethanol may also be produced industrially from ethene (ethylene). Addition of water to the double bond converts ethene to ethanol:

CH2=CH2 + H2O CH3CH2OH

This is done in the presence of an acid which catalyzes the reaction, but is not consumed. The ethene is produced from petroleum by steam cracking.

When ethanol is burned in the atmosphere rather than in pure oxygen, other chemical reactions occur with different components of the atmosphere such as N2. This leads to the production of nitrous oxides NOx , a major air pollutant.

Sources

Main article: Energy crop

Sugar cane harvest

Cornfield in South Africa

Switchgrass

Ethanol is a renewable energy source because the energy is generated by using a resource, sunlight, which is naturally replenished. Creation of ethanol starts with photosynthesis causing a feedstock, such as sugar cane or corn, to grow. These feedstocks are processed into ethanol.

About 5% of the ethanol produced in the world in 2003 was actually a petroleum product. It is made by the catalytic hydration of ethylene with sulfuric acid as the catalyst. It can also be obtained via ethylene or acetylene, from calcium carbide, coal, oil gas, and other sources. Two million tons of petroleum-derived ethanol are produced annually. The principal suppliers are plants in the United States, Europe, and South Africa. Petroleum derived ethanol (synthetic ethanol) is chemically identical to bio-ethanol and can be differentiated only by radiocarbon dating.

Bio-ethanol is usually obtained from the conversion of carbon based feedstock. Agricultural feedstocks are considered renewable because they get energy from the sun using photosynthesis, provided that all minerals required for growth (such as nitrogen and phosphorus) are returned to the land. Ethanol can be produced from a variety of feedstocks such as sugar cane, bagasse, miscanthus, sugar beet, sorghum, grain sorghum, switchgrass, barley, hemp, kenaf, potatoes, sweet potatoes, cassava, sunflower, fruit, molasses, corn, stover, grain, wheat, straw, cotton, other biomass, as well as many types of cellulose waste and harvestings, whichever has the best well-to-wheel assessment.

An alternative process to produce bio-ethanol from algae is being developed by the company Algenol. Rather than grow algae and then harvest and ferment it the algae grow in sunlight and produce ethanol directly which is removed without killing the algae. It is claimed the process can produce 6000 gallons per acre per year compared with 400 gallons for corn production.

Currently, the first generation processes for the production of ethanol from corn use only a small part of the corn plant: the corn kernels are taken from the corn plant and only the starch, which represents about 50% of the dry kernel mass, is transformed into ethanol. Two types of second generation processes are under development. The first type uses enzymes and yeast to convert the plant cellulose into ethanol while the second type uses pyrolysis to convert the whole plant to either a liquid bio-oil or a syngas. Second generation processes can also be used with plants such as grasses, wood or agricultural waste material such as straw.

Production process

See also: problems associated with corn-derived ethanol

The basic steps for large scale production of ethanol are: microbial (yeast) fermentation of sugars, distillation, dehydration (requirements vary, see Ethanol fuel mixtures, below), and denaturing (optional). Prior to fermentation, some crops require saccharification or hydrolysis of carbohydrates such as cellulose and starch into sugars. Saccharification of cellulose is called cellulolysis (see cellulosic ethanol). Enzymes are used to convert starch into sugar.

Fermentation

Main article: Ethanol fermentation

Ethanol is produced by microbial fermentation of the sugar. Microbial fermentation will currently only work directly with sugars. Two major components of plants, starch and cellulose, are both made up of sugars, and can in principle be converted to sugars for fermentation. Currently, only the sugar (e.g. sugar cane) and starch (e.g. corn) portions can be economically converted. However, there is much activity in the area of cellulosic ethanol, where the cellulose part of a plant is broken down to sugars and subsequently converted to ethanol.

Distillation

Ethanol plant in West Burlington, Iowa

Ethanol plant in Sertozinho, Brazil.

For the ethanol to be usable as a fuel, water must be removed. Most of the water is removed by distillation, but the purity is limited to 95-96% due to the formation of a low-boiling water-ethanol azeotrope. The 95.6% m/m (96.5% v/v) ethanol, 4.4% m/m (3.5% v/v) water mixture may be used as a fuel alone, but unlike anhydrous ethanol, is immiscible in gasoline, so the water fraction is typically removed in further treatment in order to burn in combination with gasoline in gasoline engines.

Dehydration

There are basically five dehydration processes to remove the water from an azeotropic ethanol/water mixture. The first process, used in many early fuel ethanol plants, is called azeotropic distillation and consists of adding benzene or cyclohexane to the mixture. When these components are added to the mixture, it forms a heterogeneous azeotropic mixture in vapor-liquid-liquid equilibrium, which when distilled produces anhydrous ethanol in the column bottom, and a vapor mixture of water and cyclohexane/benzene. When condensed, this becomes a two-phase liquid mixture. Another early method, called extractive distillation, consists of adding a ternary component which will increase ethanol’s relative volatility. When the ternary mixture is distilled, it will produce anhydrous ethanol on the top stream of the column.

With increasing attention being paid to saving energy, many methods have been proposed that avoid distillation all together for dehydration. Of these methods, a third method has emerged and has been adopted by the majority of modern ethanol plants. This new process uses molecular sieves to remove water from fuel ethanol. In this process, ethanol vapor under pressure passes through a bed of molecular sieve beads. The bead’s pores are sized to allow absorption of water while excluding ethanol. After a period of time, the bed is regenerated under vacuum to remove the absorbed water. Two beds are used so that one is available to absorb water while the other is being regenerated. This dehydration technology can account for energy saving of 3,000 btus/gallon (840 kJ/l) compared to earlier azeotropic distillation.

Technology

Ethanol-based engines

Ethanol is most commonly used to power automobiles, though it may be used to power other vehicles, such as farm tractors, boats and airplanes. Ethanol (E100) consumption in an engine is approximately 51% higher than for gasoline since the energy per unit volume of ethanol is 34% lower than for gasoline. However, the higher compression ratios in an ethanol-only engine allow for increased power output and better fuel economy than could be obtained with lower compression ratios. In general, ethanol-only engines are tuned to give slightly better power and torque output than gasoline-powered engines. In flexible fuel vehicles, the lower compression ratio requires tunings that give the same output when using either gasoline or hydrated ethanol. For maximum use of ethanol’s benefits, a much higher compression ratio should be used, which would render that engine unsuitable for gasoline use. When ethanol fuel availability allows high-compression ethanol-only vehicles to be practical, the fuel efficiency of such engines should be equal to or greater than current gasoline engines. Current high compression ethanol-only engine designs are approximately 20-30% less fuel efficient than their gasoline-only counterparts.

A 2004 MIT study and an earlier paper published by the Society of Automotive Engineers identify a method to exploit the characteristics of fuel ethanol substantially better than mixing it with gasoline. The method presents the possibility of leveraging the use of alcohol to achieve definite improvement over the cost-effectiveness of hybrid electric. The improvement consists of using dual-fuel direct-injection of pure alcohol (or the azeotrope or E85) and gasoline, in any ratio up to 100% of either, in a turbocharged, high compression-ratio, small-displacement engine having performance similar to an engine having twice the displacement. Each fuel is carried separately, with a much smaller tank for alcohol. The high-compression (which increases efficiency) engine will run on ordinary gasoline under low-power cruise conditions. Alcohol is directly injected into the cylinders (and the gasoline injection simultaneously reduced) only when necessary to suppress nock such as when significantly accelerating. Direct cylinder injection raises the already high octane rating of ethanol up to an effective 130. The calculated over-all reduction of gasoline use and CO2 emission is 30%. The consumer cost payback time shows a 4:1 improvement over turbo-diesel and a 5:1 improvement over hybrid. In addition, the problems of water absorption into pre-mixed gasoline (causing phase separation), supply issues of multiple mix ratios and cold-weather starting are avoided.

Ethanol’s higher octane rating allows an increase of an engine’s compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency. In one study, complex engine controls and increased exhaust gas recirculation allowed a compression ratio of 19.5 with fuels ranging from neat ethanol to E50. Thermal efficiency up to approximately that for a diesel was achieved. This would result in the MPG (miles per gallon) of a dedicated ethanol vehicle to be about the same as one burning gasoline.

Since 1989 there have also been ethanol engines based on the diesel principle operating in Sweden. They are used primarily in city buses, but also in distribution trucks and waste collectors. The engines, made by Scania, have a modified compression ratio, and the fuel (known as ED95) used is a mix of 93.6 % ethanol and 3.6 % ignition improver, and 2.8% denaturants. The ignition improver makes it possible for the fuel to ignite in the diesel combustion cycle. It is then also possible to use the energy efficiency of the diesel principle with ethanol. These engines have been used in the United Kingdom by Reading Transport but the use of bioethanol fuel is now being phased out.why

Engine cold start during the winter

The Brazilian 2008 Honda Civic flex-fuel has outside direct access to the secondary reservoir gasoline tank in the front right side, the corresponding fuel filler door is shown by the arrow.

High ethanol blends present a problem to achieve enough vapor pressure for the fuel to evaporate and spark the ignition during cold weather (since ethanol tends to increase fuel enthalpy of vaporization). When vapor pressure is below 45 kPa starting a cold engine becomes difficult. In order to avoid this problem at temperatures below 11 Celsius (59 F), and to reduce ethanol higher emissions during cold weather, both the US and the European markets adopted E85 as the maximum blend to be used in their flexible fuel vehicles, and they are optimized to run at such a blend. At places with harsh cold weather, the ethanol blend in the US has a seasonal reduction to E70 for these very cold regions, though it is still sold as E85. At places where temperatures fall below -12 C (10 F) during the winter, it is recommended to install an engine heater system, both for gasoline and E85 vehicles. Sweden has a similar seasonal reduction, but the ethanol content in the blend is reduced to E75 during the winter months.

Brazilian flex fuel vehicles can operate with ethanol mixtures up to E100, which is hydrous ethanol (with up to 4% water), which causes vapor pressure to drop faster as compared to E85 vehicles. As a result, Brazilian flex vehicles are built with a small secondary gasoline reservoir located near the engine. During a cold start pure gasoline is injected to avoid starting problems at low temperatures. This provision is particularly necessary for users of Brazil’s southern and central regions, where temperatures normally drop below 15 Celsius (59 F) during the winter. An improved flex engine generation was launched in 2009 that eliminates the need for the secondary gas storage tank. In March 2009 Volkswagen do Brasil launched the Polo E-Flex, the first Brazilian flex fuel model without an auxiliary tank for cold start.

Ethanol fuel mixtures

For more details on this topic, see Common ethanol fuel mixtures.

Hydrated ethanol gasoline type C price table for use in Brazil

To avoid engine stall due to “slugs” of water in the fuel lines interrupting fuel flow, the fuel must exist as a single phase. The fraction of water that an ethanol-gasoline fuel can contain without phase separation increases with the percentage of ethanol.. This shows, for example, that E30 can have up to about 2% water. If there is more than about 71% ethanol, the remainder can be any proportion of water or gasoline and phase separation will not occur. However, the fuel mileage declines with increased water content. The increased solubility of water with higher ethanol content permits E30 and hydrated ethanol to be put in the same tank since any combination of them always results in a single phase. Somewhat less water is tolerated at lower temperatures. For E10 it is about 0.5% v/v at 70 F and decreases to about 0.23% v/v at -30 F.

In many countries cars are mandated to run on mixtures of ethanol. Brazil requires cars be suitable for a 25% ethanol blend, and has required various mixtures between 22% and 25% ethanol, since of July 2007 25% is required. The United States allows up to 10% blends, and some states require this (or a smaller amount) in all gasoline sold. Other countries have adopted their own requirements. Beginning with the model year 1999, an increasing number of vehicles in the world are manufactured with engines which can run on any fuel from 0% ethanol up to 100% ethanol without modification. Many cars and light trucks (a class containing minivans, SUVs and pickup trucks) are designed to be flexible-fuel vehicles (also called dual-fuel vehicles). In older model years, their engine systems contained alcohol sensors in the fuel and/or oxygen sensors in the exhaust that provide input to the engine control computer to adjust the fuel injection to achieve stochiometric (no residual fuel or free oxygen in the exhaust) air-to-fuel ratio for any fuel mix. In newer models, the alcohol sensors have been removed, with the computer using only oxygen and airflow sensor feedback to estimate alcohol content. The engine control computer can also adjust (advance) the ignition timing to achieve a higher output without pre-ignition when it predicts that higher alcohol percentages are present in the fuel being burned. This method is backed up by advanced knock sensors – used in most high performance gasoline engines regardless of whether they’re designed to use ethanol or not – that detect pre-ignition and detonation.

Fuel economy

In theory, all fuel-driven vehicles have a fuel economy (measured as miles per US gallon, or liters per 100 km) that is directly proportional to the fuel’s energy content. In reality, there are many other variables that come in to play that affect the performance of a particular fuel in a particular engine. Ethanol contains approx. 34% less energy per unit volume than gasoline, and therefore in theory, burning pure ethanol in a vehicle will result in a 34% reduction in miles per US gallon, given the same fuel economy, compared to burning pure gasoline. Since ethanol has a higher octane rating, the engine can be made more efficient by raising its compression ratio. In fact using a variable turbocharger, the compression ratio can be optimized for the fuel being used, making fuel economy almost constant for any blend. . For E10 (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline), the effect is small (~3%) when compared to conventional gasoline, and even smaller (1-2%) when compared to oxygenated and reformulated blends. However, for E85 (85% ethanol), the effect becomes significant. E85 will produce lower mileage than gasoline, and will require more frequent refueling. Actual performance may vary depending on the vehicle. Based on EPA tests for all 2006 E85 models, the average fuel economy for E85 vehicles resulted 25.56% lower than unleaded gasoline. The EPA-rated mileage of current USA flex-fuel vehicles should be considered when making price comparisons, but it must be noted that E85 is a high performance fuel, with an octane rating of about 104, and should be compared to premium. In one estimate the US retail price for E85 ethanol is 2.62 US dollar per gallon or 3.71 dollar corrected for energy equivalency compared to a gallon of gasoline priced at 3.03 dollar. Brazilian cane ethanol (100%) is priced at 3.88 dollar against 4.91 dollar for E25 (as July 2007).

Consumer production systems

While biodiesel production systems have been marketed to home and business users for many years, commercialized ethanol production systems designed for end-consumer use have lagged in the marketplace. In 2008, two different companies announced home-scale ethanol production systems. The AFS125 Advanced Fuel System from Allard Research and Development is capable of producing both ethanol and biodiesel in one machine, while the E-100 MicroFueler from E-Fuel Corporation is dedicated to ethanol only.

Experience by country

The world’s top ethanol fuel producers in 2008 were the United States with 9.0 billion U.S. liquid gallons (bg) and Brazil (6.47 bg), accounting for 89% of world production of 17.33 billion US gallons (65.6 million liters). Strong incentives, coupled with other industry development initiatives, are giving rise to fledgling ethanol industries in countries such as Canada, China, Thailand, Colombia, India, Australia, and some Central American countries. Nevertheless, ethanol has yet to make a dent in world oil consumption of approximately 4000 million tonnes/yr (84 million barrels/day) in 2006.

Total Annual Ethanol Production (All Grades)

by Country (2004-2006)

Top 15 countries

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons per year)

Annual Fuel Ethanol Production

by Country (2007-2008)

Top 15 countries/blocks

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons per year)

World

rank

Country

2006

2005

2004

World

rank

Country/Region

2008

2007

1

 United States

4,855

4,264

3,535

1

 United States

9,000.0

6,498.6

2

 Brazil

4,491

4,227

3,989

2

 Brazil

6,472.2

5,019.2

3

 China

1,017

1,004

964

3

 European Union

733.6

570.3

4

 India

502

449

462

4

 China

501.9

486.0

5

 France

251

240

219

5

 Canada

237.7

211.3

6

 Germany

202

114

71

6

 Thailand

89.8

79.2

7

 Russia

171

198

198

7

 Colombia

79.3

74.9

8

 Canada

153

61

61

8

 India

66.0

52.8

9

 Spain

122

93

79

9

Central America

n/a

39.6

10

 South Africa

102

103

110

10

 Australia

26.4

26.4

11

 Thailand

93

79

74

11

 Turkey

n/a

15.8

12

 United Kingdom

74

92

106

12

 Pakistan

n/a

9.2

13

 Ukraine

71

65

66

13

 Peru

n/a

7.9

14

 Poland

66

58

53

14

 Argentina

n/a

5.2

15

 Saudi Arabia

52

32

79

15

 Paraguay

n/a

4.7

World Total

13,489

12,150

10,770

World Total

17,335.29

13,101.7

Brazil

Main articles: Ethanol fuel in Brazil and History of ethanol fuel in Brazil

Brazil has ethanol fuel available throughout the country. A typical Petrobras filling station at So Paulo with dual fuel service, marked A for alcohol (ethanol) and G for gasoline.

Typical Brazilian “flex” models from several carmakers, that run on any blend of ethanol and gasoline, from E20-E25 gasohol to E100 ethanol fuel.

The Honda CG 150 Titan Mix was launched in the Brazilian market in 2009 and became the first flex-fuel motorcycle sold in the world.

Brazil has the largest and most successful bio-fuel programs in the world, involving production of ethanol fuel from sugar cane, and it is considered to have the world’s first sustainable biofuels economy. In 2006 Brazilian ethanol provided 18% of the country’s road transport sector fuel consumption needs, and by April 2008, more than 50% of fuel consumption for the gasoline market. As a result of the increasing use of ethanol, together with the exploitation of domestic deep water oil sources, Brazil, which years ago had to import a large share of the petroleum needed for domestic consumption, in 2006 reached complete self-sufficiency in oil supply.

Together, Brazil and the United States lead the industrial world in global ethanol production, accounting together for 70% of the world’s production and nearly 90% of ethanol used for fuel. In 2006 Brazil produced 16.3 billion liters (4.3 billion U.S. liquid gallons), which represents 33.3% of the world’s total ethanol production and 42% of the world’s ethanol used as fuel. Sugar cane plantations cover 3.6 million hectares of land for ethanol production, representing just 1% of Brazil’s arable land, with a productivity of 7,500 liters of ethanol per hectare, as compared with the U.S. maize ethanol productivity of 3,000 liters per hectare.

The ethanol industry in Brazil is more than 30 year-old and even though it is no longer subsidized, production and use of ethanol was stimulated through:

Low-interest loans for the construction of ethanol distilleries

Guaranteed purchase of ethanol by the state-owned oil company at a reasonable price

Retail pricing of neat ethanol so it is competitive if not slightly favorable to the gasoline-ethanol blend

Tax incentives provided during the 1980s to stimulate the purchase of neat ethanol vehicles.

Guaranteed purchase and price regulation were ended some years ago, with relatively positive results. In addition to these other policies, ethanol producers in the state of So Paulo established a research and technology transfer center that has been effective in improving sugar cane and ethanol yields.

There are no longer light vehicles in Brazil running on pure gasoline. Since 1977 the government made mandatory to blend 20% of ethanol (E20) with gasoline (gasohol), requiring just a minor adjustment on regular gasoline motors. Today the mandatory blend is allowed to vary nationwide between 20% to 25% ethanol (E25) and it is used by all regular gasoline vehicles and flexible-fuel vehicles. The Brazilian car manufacturing industry developed flexible-fuel vehicles that can run on any proportion of gasoline and ethanol. Introduced in the market in 2003, these vehicles became a commercial success. By December 2009 the fleet of “flex” cars and light commercial vehicles had reached 9.35 million vehicles, and 183.3 thousand flex-fuel motorcycles. The ethanol-powered and “flex” vehicles, as they are popularly known, are manufactured to tolerate hydrated ethanol (E100), an azeotrope composed of 95.6% ethanol and 4.4% water.

The latest innovation within the Brazilian flexible-fuel technology is the development of flex-fuel motorcycles. The first flex motorcycle was launched to the market by Honda in March 2009. Produced by its Brazilian subsidiary Moto Honda da Amaznia, the CG 150 Titan Mix is sold for around US$2,700. During the first eight months after its market launch the CG 150 Titan Mix has sold 139,059 motorcycles, capturing a 10.6% market share, and ranking second in sales of new motorcycles in the Brazilian market by October 2009.

United States

 United States fuel ethanol

production and imports

(2001-2008)

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons)

Year

Production

Imports

Demand

2001

1,770

n/a

n/a

2002

2,130

46

2,085

2003

2,800

61

2,900

2004

3,400

161

3,530

2005

3,904

135

4,049

2006

4,855

653

5,377

2007

6,500

450

6,847

2008

9,000

556

9,637

Note: Demand figures includes stocks change

and small exports in 2005

Main article: Ethanol fuel in the United States

The United States produces and consumes more ethanol fuel than any other country in the world. Ethanol use as fuel dates back to Henry Ford, who in 1896 designed his first car, the “Quadricycle” to run on pure ethanol. Then in 1908, he produced the famous Ford Model T capable of running on gasoline, ethanol or a combination of both. Ford continued to advocate for ethanol as fuel even during the prohibition.

Most cars on the road today in the U.S. can run on blends of up to 10% ethanol, and motor vehicle manufacturers already produce vehicles designed to run on much higher ethanol blends. In 2007 Portland, Oregon, became the first city in the United States to require all gasoline sold within city limits to contain at least 10% ethanol. As of January 2008, three states Missouri, Minnesota, and Hawaii require ethanol to be blended with gasoline motor fuel. Many cities also require ethanol blends due to non-attainment of federal air quality goals.

E85 FlexFuel Chevrolet Impala LT 2009, Miami, Florida.

Several motor vehicle manufacturers, including Ford, Chrysler, and GM, sell flexible-fuel vehicles that can use gasoline and ethanol blends ranging from pure gasoline all the way up to 85% ethanol (E85). By mid-2006, there were approximately six million E85-compatible vehicles on U.S. roads.

In the USA there are currently about 1,900 stations distributing ethanol, although most stations are in the corn belt area. One of the debated methods for distribution in the US is using existing oil pipelines, which raises concerns over corrosion. In any case, some companies proposed building a 1,700-mile pipeline to carry ethanol from the Midwest through Central Pennsylvania to New York.

The production of fuel ethanol from corn in the United States is controversial for a few reasons. Production of ethanol from corn is 5 to 6 times less efficient than producing it from sugarcane. Ethanol production from corn is highly dependent upon subsidies and it consumes a food crop to produce fuel. The subsidies paid to fuel blenders and ethanol refineries have often been cited as the reason for driving up the price of corn, and in farmers planting more corn and the conversion of considerable land to corn (maize) production which generally consumes more fertilizers and pesticides than many other land uses. This is at odds with the subsidies actually paid directly to farmers that are designed to take corn land out of production and pay farmers to plant grass and idle the land, often in conjunction with soil conservation programs, in an attempt to boost corn prices. Recent developments with cellulosic ethanol production and commercialization may allay some of these concerns. A theoretically much more efficient way of ethanol production has been suggested to use sugar beets which make about the same amount of ethanol as corn without using the corn food crop especially since sugar beets can grow in less tropical conditions than sugar cane.

Most of the ethanol consumed in the US is in the form of low blends with gasoline up to 10%. Shown a fuel pump in Maryland selling mandatory E10.

On October 2008 the first “biofuels corridor” was officially opened along I-65, a major interstate highway in the central United States. Stretching from northern Indiana to southern Alabama, this corridor consisting of more than 200 individual fueling stations makes it possible to drive a flex-fueled vehicle from Lake Michigan to the Gulf of Mexico without being further than a quarter tank worth of fuel from an E85 pump.

On April 23, 2009, the California Air Resources Board approved the specific rules and carbon intensity reference values for the California Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) that will go into effect in January 1, 2011. During the consultation process there was controversy regarding the inclusion and modeling of indirect land use change effects. After the CARB’s ruling, among other criticisms, representatives of the US ethanol industry complained that this standard overstates the environmental effects of corn ethanol, and also criticized the inclusion of indirect effects of land-use changes as an unfair penalty to domestically produced corn ethanol because deforestation in the developing world is being tied to US ethanol production. The initial reference value set for 2011 for LCFS means that Mid-west corn ethanol will not meet the California standard unless current carbon intensity is reduced.

A similar controversy arose after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published on May 5, 2009, its notice of proposed rulemaking for the new Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The draft of the regulations was released for public comment during a 60-day period. EPA’s proposed regulations also included the carbon footprint from indirect land-use changes. On the same day, President Barack Obama signed a Presidential Directive with the aim to advance biofuels research and improve their commercialization. The Directive established a Biofuels Interagency Working Group comprise of three agencies, the Department of Agriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Energy. This group will developed a plan to increase flexible fuel vehicle use and assist in retail marketing efforts. Also they will coordinate infrastructure policies impacting the supply, secure transport, and distribution of biofuels. The group will also come up with policy ideas for increasing investment in next-generation fuels, such as cellulosic ethanol, and for reducing the environmental footprint of growing biofuels crops, particularly corn-based ethanol.

Europe

Production of Bioethanol in the

 European Union (GWh)

No

Country

2005

2006

1

 Germany

978

2,554

2

 Spain

1,796

2,382

3

 France

853

1,482

4

 Sweden

907

830

5

 Italy

47

759

6

 Poland

379

711

7

 Hungary

207

201

8

 Lithuania

47

107

9

 Netherlands

47

89

10

 Czech Republic

0

89

11

 Latvia

71

71

12

 Finland

77

0

27

Total

5,411

9,274

n.a. = not available

Consumption of Bioethanol in the

 European Union (GWh)

No

Country

2005

2006

2007

1

 Germany

1,682

3,544

3,408

2

 France

871

1,719

3,174

3

 Sweden

1,681

1,894

2,113

4

 Spain

1,314

1,332

1,310

5

 Poland

329

611

991

6

 United Kingdom

502

563

907

7

 Bulgaria

-

0

769

8

 Austria

0

0

254

9

 Slovakia

0

4

154

10

 Lithuania

10

64

135

11

 Hungary

28

136

107

12

 Netherlands

0

179

101

13

 Denmark

-

42

70

14

 Ireland

0

13

54

15

 Latvia

5

12

20

16

 Luxembourg

0

0

10

17

 Slovenia

0

2

9

18

 Czech Republic

0

13

2

19

 Italy

59

0

0

20

 Finland

0

10

n.a.

27

EU

6,481

10,138

13,563

The consumption of bioethanol is largest in Europe in Germany, Sweden, France and Spain. Europe produces equivalent to 90% of its consumption (2006). Germany produced ca 70% of its consumption, Spain 60% and Sweden 50% (2006). In Sweden there are 792 E85 filling stations and in France 131 E85 service stations with 550 more under construction.

On Monday, September 17, 2007 the first ethanol fuel pump was opened in Reykjavik, Iceland. This pump is the only one of its kind in Iceland. The fuel is imported by Brimborg, a Volvo dealer, as a pilot to see how ethanol fueled cars work in Iceland.

In The Netherlands regular petrol with no bio-additives is slowly being outphased, since EU-legislation has been passed that requires the fraction of nonmineral origin to become minimum 5.75% of the total fuel consumption volume in 2010. This can be realised by substitutions in diesel or in petrol of any biological source; or fuel sold in the form of pure biofuel. (2007) There are only a few gas stations where E85 is sold, which is an 85% ethanol, 15% petrol mix. Directly neighbouring country Germany is reported to have a much better biofuel infrastructure and offers both E85 and E50. Biofuel is taxed equally as regular fuel. However, fuel tanked abroad cannot be taxed and a recent payment receipt will in most cases suffice to prevent fines if customs check tank contents. (Authorities are aware of high taxation on fuels and cross-border fuel refilling is a well-known practice.)

An example of an ethanol powered bus. This is a Scania OmniCity which has been touring the United Kingdom, which does not use the fuel widely. A larger fleet of similar buses will enter service in Stockholm in 2008.

Sweden

Main article: Ethanol fuel in Sweden

Sweden is the leading country in Europe regarding the use of ethanol as fuel, though it has to import most of the ethanol. All Swedish gas stations are required by an act of parliament to offer at least one alternative fuel, and every fifth car in Stockholm now drives at least partially on alternative fuels, mostly ethanol. The number of bioethanol stations in Europe is highest in Sweden, with 1,200 stations and a fleet of 116 thousand flexi-fuel vehicles as of July 2008.

Stockholm will introduce a fleet of Swedish-made electric hybrid buses in its public transport system on a trial basis in 2008. These buses will use ethanol-powered internal-combustion engines and electric motors. The vehicles diesel engines will use ethanol.

In order to achieve a broader use of biofuels several government incentives were implemented. Ethanol, as the other biofuels, were exempted of both, the CO2 and energy taxes until 2009, resulting in a 30% price reduction at the pump of E85 fuel over gasoline. Furthermore, other demand side incentives for flexifuel vehicle owners include a USD 1,800 bonus to buyers of FFVs, exemption from the Stockholm congestion tax, up to 20% discount on auto insurance, free parking spaces in most of the largest cities, lower annual registration taxes, and a 20% tax reduction for flexifuel company cars. Also, a part of the program, the Swedish Government ruled that 25% of their vehicle purchases (excluding police, fire and ambulance vehicles) must be alternative fuel vehicles.; By the first months of 2008, this package of incentives resulted in sales of flexible-fuel cars representing 25% of new car sales.

Bioethanol stations

 European Union

Country

Stations

No/106

persons

 Sweden

1,200

131.26

 France

211

3.27

 Germany

193

2.35

 Switzerland

40

5.27

 Ireland

29

6.84

 United Kingdom

22

0.36

Asia

China

Main article: Bioenergy in China

China is promoting ethanol-based fuel on a pilot basis in five cities in its central and northeastern region, a move designed to create a new market for its surplus grain and reduce consumption of petroleum. The cities include Zhengzhou, Luoyang and Nanyang in central China’s Henan province, and Harbin and Zhaodong in Heilongjiang province, northeast China. Under the program, Henan will promote ethanol-based fuel across the province by the end of this year. Officials say the move is of great importance in helping to stabilize grain prices, raise farmers’ income and reducing petrol- induced air pollution.

Thailand

Thailand already use 10% ethanol (E10) widely on big scale on the local market. Beginning in 2008 Thailand started with the sale of E20 and by late 2008 E85 flexible fuel vehicles were introduced with only two gas stations selling E85.

Thailand is now converting some of the cassava stock hold by the government into fuel ethanol. Cassava-based ethanol productions are being ramped up to help manage the agricultural outputs of both cassava and sugar cane. With its abundant biomass resources, it is believed that the fuel ethanol program will be a new means of job creation in the rural areas while enhancing the balance sheet of fuel imports.

Australia

Main article: Ethanol fuel in Australia

Legislation in Australia imposes a 10% cap on the concentration of fuel ethanol blends. Blends of 90% unleaded petrol and 10% fuel ethanol are commonly referred to as E10. E10 is available through service stations operating under the BP, Caltex, Shell and United brands as well as those of a number of smaller independents. Not surprisingly, E10 is most widely available closer to the sources of production in Queensland and New South Wales where Sugar Cane is grown. E10 is most commonly blended with 91 RON “regular unleaded” fuel. There is a requirement that retailers label blends containing fuel ethanol on the dispenser.

Due to ethanol’s greater stability under pressure it is used by Shell in their 100 octane fuel. Similarly IFS add 10% ethanol to their 91 octane fuel, label it premium fuel and sell it more cheaply that regular unleaded. This is converse to the general practice of adding ethanol to a lesser quality fuel to bring its octane rating up to 91.

Some concern was raised over the use of ethanol blend fuels in petrol vehicles in 2003, yet manufacturers widely claimed that their vehicles were engined for such fuels. Since then there have been no reports of adverse affects to vehicles running on ethanol blended fuels.

Caribbean Basin

 United States fuel ethanol

imports by country

(2002-2007)

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons)

Country

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

 Brazil

188.8

433.7

31.2

90.3

0

0

 Jamaica

75.2

66.8

36.3

36.6

39.3

29.0

 El Salvador

73.3

38.5

23.7

5.7

6.9

4.5

 Trinidad and Tobago

42.7

24.8

10.0

0

0

0

 Costa Rica

39.3

35.9

33.4

25.4

14.7

12.0

All countries in Central America, northern South America and the Caribbean are located in a tropical zone with suitable climate for growing sugar cane. In fact, most of these countries have a long tradition of growing sugar cane mainly for producing sugar and alcoholic beverages.

As a result of the guerilla movements in Central America, in 1983 the United States unilateral and temporarily approved the Caribbean Basin Initiative, allowing most countries in the region to benefit from several tariff and trade benefits. These benefits were made permanent in 1990 and more recently, these benefits were replaced by the Caribbean Basin Trade and Partnership Act, approved in 2000, and the Dominican Republicentral America Free Trade Agreement that went to effect in 2008. All these agreements have allowed several countries in the region to export ethanol to the U.S free of tariffs. Until 2004, the countries that benefited the most were Jamaica and Costa Rica, but as the U.S. began demanding more fuel ethanol, the two countries increased their exports and two others began exporting. In 2007, Jamaica, El Salvador, Trinidad & Tobago and Costa Rica exported together to the U.S. a total of 230.5 million gallons of ethanol, representing 54.1% of U.S. fuel ethanol imports. Brasil began exporting ethanol to the U.S. in 2004 and exported 188.8 million gallons representing 44.3% of U.S. ethanol imports in 2007. The remaining imports that year came from Canada and China.

In March 2007, “ethanol diplomacy” was the focus of President George W. Bush’s Latin American tour, in which he and Brazil’s president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, were seeking to promote the production and use of sugar cane based ethanol throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. The two countries also agreed to share technology and set international standards for biofuels. The Brazilian sugar cane technology transfer would allow several Central American, Caribbean and Andean countries to take advantage of their tariff-free trade agreements to increase or become exporters to the United States in the short-term. Also, in August 2007, Brazil’s President toured Mexico and several countries in Central America and the Caribbean to promote Brazilian ethanol technology. The ethanol alliance between the U.S. and Brazil generated some negative reactions from Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez, and by then Cuba’s President, Fidel Castro, who wrote that “you will see how many people among the hungry masses of our planet will no longer consume corn.” “Or even worse,” he continued, “by offering financing to poor countries to produce ethanol from corn or any other kind of food, no tree will be left to defend humanity from climate change.”‘ Daniel Ortega, Nicaragua’s President, and one of the preferencial recipients of Brazilian technical aid also voiced critics to the Bush plan, but he vowed support for sugar cane based ethanol during Lula’s visit to Nicaragua.

Colombia

Colombia’s ethanol program began in 2002, based on a law approved in 2001 mandating a mix of 10% ethanol with regular gasoline, and the plan is to gradually reach a 25% blend in twenty-years. Sugar cane-based ethanol production began in 2005, when the law went into effect, and as local production was not enough to supply enough ethanol to the entire country’s fleet, the program was implemented only on cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants, such as Cali, Pereira, and the capital city of Bogot. All of the ethanol production comes from the Department of Valle del Cauca, Colombia’s traditional sugar cane region. Cassava is the second source of ethanol, and potatoes and castor oil are also being studied.

On March 2009 the Colombian government enacted a mandate to introduce E85 flexible-fuel cars. The executive decree applies to all gasoline-powered vehicles with engines smaller than 2.0 liters manufactured, imported, and commercialized in the country beginning in 2012, mandating that 60% of such vehicles must have flex-fuel engines capable of running with gasoline or E85, or any blend of both. By 2014 the mandatory quota is 80% and it will reach 100% by 2016. All vehicles with engines bigger than 2.0 liters must be E85 capable starting in 2013. The decree also mandates that by 2011 all gasoline stations must provide infrastructure to guarantee availability of E85 throughout the country. The mandatory introduction of E85 flex-fuels has been controversial.

Costa Rica

The government, based on the National Biofuel Program, established the mandatory use of all gasoline sold in Costa Rica with a blend of around 7.5% ethanol, starting in October 2008. The implementation phase follows a two year trial that took place in the provinces of Guanacaste and Puntarenas. The government expects to increase the percent of ethanol mixed with gasoline to 12% in the next 4 to 5 years. The Costa Rican government is pursuing this policy to lower the country’s dependency of foreign oil and to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases produced. The plan also calls for an increase in ethanol producing crops and tax breaks for flex-fuel vehicles and other alternative fuel vehicles. However, the introduction of the blend of 7% ethanol was postponed in September 2008 until the beginning of 2009. This delay was due to a request by the national association of fuel retailers to have more time available to adapt their fueling infrastructure. Additional delays caused another postponement, as fueling stations were not ready yet for handling ethanol fuel, and now implementation is expected for November 2009.
Despite the official postponement, during the months of February and March 2009, ethanol in different blends was sold without warning to consumers, which was cause for complains. The national distribution company, RECOPE, explained that it had already bought 50,000 barrels of ethanol stored and ready for distribution, so it decided to used as an oxygenate in substitution of MTBE. Nevertheless, retail sales of E7 continue uninterrupted in the trial regions of Guanacaste and the Central Pacific for three years now.

El Salvador

As a result of the cooperation agreement between the United States and Brazil, El Salvador was chosen in 2007 to lead a pilot experience to introduce state-of-the-art technology for growing sugar cane for production of ethanol fuel in Central America, as this technical bilateral cooperation is looking for helping Central American countries to reduce their dependence on foreign oil.

Comparison of Brazil and the U.S.

Evolution of the ethanol productivity per hectare of sugarcane planted in Brazil between 1975 and 2004. Source: Goldemberg (2008).

Brazil’s sugar cane-based industry is far more efficient than the U.S. corn-based industry. Brazilian distillers are able to produce ethanol for 22 cents per liter, compared with the 30 cents per liter for corn-based ethanol. Sugarcane cultivation requires a tropical or subtropical climate, with a minimum of 600 mm (24 in) of annual rainfall. Sugarcane is one of the most efficient photosynthesizers in the plant kingdom, able to convert up to 2% of incident solar energy into biomass. Ethanol is produced by yeast fermentation of the sugar extracted from sugar cane.

Sugarcane production in the United States occurs in Florida, Louisiana, Hawaii, and Texas. In prime growing regions, such as Hawaii, sugarcane can produce 20 kg for each square meter exposed to the sun. The first three plants to produce sugar cane-based ethanol are expected to go online in Louisiana by mid 2009. Sugar mill plants in Lacassine, St. James and Bunkie were converted to sugar cane-based ethanol production using Colombian technology in order to make possible a profitable ethanol production. These three plants will produce 100 million gallons of ethanol within five years.

U.S. corn-derived ethanol costs 30% more because the corn starch must first be converted to sugar before being distilled into alcohol. Despite this cost differential in production, in contrast to Japan and Sweden, the U.S. does not import much of Brazilian ethanol because of U.S. trade barriers corresponding to a tariff of 54-cent per gallon a levy designed to offset the 45-cent per gallon blender’s federal tax credit that is applied to ethanol no matter its country of origin. One advantage U.S. corn-derived ethanol offers is the ability to return 1/3 of the feedstock back into the market as a replacement for the corn used in the form of Distillers Dried Grain.

Comparison of key characteristics between

the ethanol industries in the United States and Brazil

Characteristic

 Brazil

 U.S.

Units/comments

Feedstock

Sugar cane

Maize

Main cash crop for ethanol production, the US has less than 2% from other crops.

Total ethanol fuel production (2008)
6,472

9,000

Million U.S. liquid gallons

Total arable land
355

270(1)

Million hectares.

Total area used for ethanol crop (2006)

3.6 (1%)

10 (3.7%)

Million hectares (% total arable)

Productivity per hectare
6,800-8,000

3,800-4,000

Liters of ethanol per hectare. Brazil is 727 to 870 gal/acre (2006), US is 321 to 424 gal/acre (2003)

Energy balance (input energy productivity)
8.3 to 10.2

1.3 to 1.6

Ratio of the energy obtained from ethanol/energy expended in its production

Estimated GHG emissions reduction
86-90%(2)

10-30%(2)

% GHGs avoided by using ethanol instead of gasoline, using existing crop land (No ILUC).

Full life-cycle carbon intensity

73.40

105.10(3)

Grams of CO2 equivalent released per MJ of energy produced, includes indirect land use changes.

Estimated payback time for GHG emissions

17 years(4)

93 years(4)

Brazilian cerrado for sugarcane and US grassland for corn. Land use change scenarios by Fargione

Flexible-fuel vehicle fleet

9.3 million

8.0 million

Autos and light trucks only. Brazil as of December 2009 (E100 FFVs). U.S. as of early 2009 (E85 FFVs).

Ethanol fueling stations in the country

35,017 (100%)

2,113(1%)

As % of total gas stations in the country. Brazil by December 2007. U.S. by January 2010. (170,000 total.)

Ethanol’s share in the gasoline market

50%(5)

4%

As % of total consumption on a volumetric basis. Brazil as of April 2008. US as of December 2006.

Cost of production (USD/gallon)
0.83

1.14

2006/2007 for Brazil (22/liter), 2004 for U.S. (35/liter)

Government subsidy (in USD)

0 (6)

0.45/gallon

U.S. since 2009-01-01 as a tax credit. Brazilian ethanol production is no longer subsidized.(6)

Import tariffs (in USD)

20% (FOB)

0.54/gallon

Brazil does not import ethanol fuel since 2002. The U.S. does in a regular basis.

Notes: (1) Only contiguous U.S., excludes Alaska. (2) Assuming no land use change. (3) CARB estimate for Midwest corn ethanol. California’s gasoline carbon intensity is 95.86 blended with 10% ethanol. (4) Assuming direct land use change. (5) If diesel-powered vehicles are included and due to ethanol’s lower energy content by volume, bioethanol represented 16.9% of the road sector energy consumption in 2007. (6) Brazilian ethanol production is no longer subsidized, but gasoline is heavily taxed favoring ethanol fuel consumption (~54% tax). By the end of July 2008, when oil prices were close to its latest peak and the Brazilian Real exchange rate to the US dollar was close to its most recent minimum, the average gasoline retail price at the pump in Brazil was USD 6.00 per gallon, while the average US price was USD 3.98 per gallon. The latest gas retail price increase in Brazil occurred in late 2005, when oil price was at USD 60 per barrel.

Environment

Energy balance

Energy balance
Country

Type

Energy balance

 United States

Corn ethanol

1.3

 Brazil

Sugarcane ethanol

8

 Germany

Biodiesel

2.5

 United States

Cellulosic ethanol

236

experimental, not in commercial production

depending on production method

Main article: Ethanol fuel energy balance

All biomass goes through at least some of these steps: it needs to be grown, collected, dried, fermented, and burned. All of these steps require resources and an infrastructure. The total amount of energy input into the process compared to the energy released by burning the resulting ethanol fuel is known as the energy balance (or “Net energy gain”). Figures compiled in a 2007 by National Geographic Magazine point to modest results for corn ethanol produced in the US: one unit of fossil-fuel energy is required to create 1.3 energy units from the resulting ethanol. The energy balance for sugarcane ethanol produced in Brazil is more favorable, 1:8. Energy balance estimates are not easily produced, thus numerous such reports have been generated that are contradictory. For instance, a separate survey reports that production of ethanol from sugarcane, which requires a tropical climate to grow productively, returns from 8 to 9 units of energy for each unit expended, as compared to corn which only returns about 1.34 units of fuel energy for each unit of energy expended.

Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, is emitted during fermentation and combustion. However, this is canceled out by the greater uptake of carbon dioxide by the plants as they grow to produce the biomass. When compared to gasoline, depending on the production method, ethanol releases less greenhouse gases.

Air pollution

Compared with conventional unleaded gasoline, ethanol is a particulate-free burning fuel source that combusts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, water and aldehydes. Gasoline produces 2.44 CO2 equivalent kg/l and ethanol 1.94 (this is 21% less CO2)[citation needed]. The Clean Air Act requires the addition of oxygenates to reduce carbon monoxide emissions in the United States. The additive MTBE is currently being phased out due to ground water contamination, hence ethanol becomes an attractive alternative additive. Current production methods include air pollution from the manufacturer of macronutrient fertilizers such as ammonia.

A study by atmospheric scientists at Stanford University found that E85 fuel would increase the risk of air pollution deaths relative to gasoline by 9% in Los Angeles, USA: a very large, urban, car-based metropolis that is a worst case scenario. Ozone levels are significantly increased, thereby increasing photochemical smog and aggravating medical problems such as asthma.

Manufacture

In 2002, monitoring the process of ethanol production from corn revealed that they released VOCs (volatile organic compounds) at a higher rate than had previously been disclosed. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) subsequently reached settlement with Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill, two of the largest producers of ethanol, to reduce emission of these VOCs. VOCs are produced when fermented corn mash is dried for sale as a supplement for livestock feed. Devices known as thermal oxidizers or catalytic oxidizers can be attached to the plants to burn off the hazardous gases.

Carbon dioxide

See also: Low-carbon fuel standard

UK government calculation of carbon intensity of corn bioethanol grown in the US and burnt in the UK.

Graph of UK figures for the carbon intensity of bioethanol and fossil fuels. This graph assumes that all bioethanols are burnt in their country of origin and that previously existing cropland is used to grow the feedstock.

The calculation of exactly how much carbon dioxide is produced in the manufacture of bioethanol is a complex and inexact process, and is highly dependent on the method by which the ethanol is produced and the assumptions made in the calculation. A calculation should include:

The cost of growing the feedstock

The cost of transporting the feedstock to the factory

The cost of processing the feedstock into bioethanol

Such a calculation may or may not consider the following effects:

The cost of the change in land use of the area where the fuel feedstock is grown.

The cost of transportation of the bioethanol from the factory to its point of use

The efficiency of the bioethanol compared with standard gasoline

The amount of Carbon Dioxide produced at the tail pipe.

The benefits due to the production of useful bi-products, such as cattle feed or electricity.

The graph on the right shows figures calculated by the UK government for the purposes of the Renewable transport fuel obligation.

The January 2006 Science article from UC Berkeley’s ERG, estimated reduction from corn ethanol in GHG to be 13% after reviewing a large number of studies. However, in a correction to that article released shortly after publication, they reduce the estimated value to 7.4%. A National Geographic Magazine overview article (2007) puts the figures at 22% less CO2 emissions in production and use for corn ethanol compared to gasoline and a 56% reduction for cane ethanol. Carmaker Ford reports a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions with bioethanol compared to petrol for one of their flexible-fuel vehicles.

An additional complication is that production requires tilling new soil which produces a one-off release of GHG that it can take decades or centuries of production reductions in GHG emissions to equalize. As an example, converting grass lands to corn production for ethanol takes about a century of annual savings to make up for the GHG released from the initial tilling.

Change in land use

See also: Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels

Large-scale farming is necessary to produce agricultural alcohol and this requires substantial amounts of cultivated land. University of Minnesota researchers report that if all corn grown in the U.S. were used to make ethanol it would displace 12% of current U.S. gasoline consumption. There are claims that land for ethanol production is acquired through deforestation, while others have observed that areas currently supporting forests are usually not suitable for growing crops. In any case, farming may involve a decline in soil fertility due to reduction of organic matter, a decrease in water availability and quality, an increase in the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and potential dislocation of local communities. However, new technology enables farmers and processors to increasingly produce the same output using less inputs.

Cellulosic ethanol production is a new approach which may alleviate land use and related concerns. Cellulosic ethanol can be produced from any plant material, potentially doubling yields, in an effort to minimize conflict between food needs vs. fuel needs. Instead of utilizing only the starch by-products from grinding wheat and other crops, cellulosic ethanol production maximizes the use of all plant materials, including gluten. This approach would have a smaller carbon footprint because the amount of energy-intensive fertilisers and fungicides remain the same for higher output of usable material. The technology for producing cellulosic ethanol is currently in the commercialization stage.

Many analysts suggest that, whichever ethanol fuel production strategy is used, fuel conservation efforts are also needed to make a large impact on reducing petroleum fuel use.

Using Ethanol for Electricity

Converting biomass to electricity for charging electric vehicles may be a more “climate-friendly” transportation option than using biomass to produce ethanol fuel, according to an analysis published in Science in May. “You make more efficient use of the land and more efficient use of the plant biomass by making electricity rather than ethanol,” said Elliott Campbell, an environmental scientist at the University of California at Merced, who led the research. “It’s another reason that, rather than race to liquid biofuels, we should consider other uses of bio-resources.”

For bioenergy to become a widespread climate solution, however, technological breakthroughs are necessary, analysts say. Researchers continue to search for more cost-effective developments in both cellulosic ethanol and advanced vehicle batteries.

Health Costs of Ethanol Emissions

For each billion ethanol-equivalent gallons of fuel produced and combusted in the US, the combined climate-change and health costs are $469 million for gasoline, $472952 million for corn ethanol depending on biorefinery heat source (natural gas, corn stover, or coal) and technology, but only $123208 million for cellulosic ethanol depending on feedstock (prairie biomass, Miscanthus, corn stover, or switchgrass).

Efficiency of common crops

As ethanol yields improve or different feedstocks are introduced, ethanol production may become more economically feasible in the US. Currently, research on improving ethanol yields from each unit of corn is underway using biotechnology. Also, as long as oil prices remain high, the economical use of other feedstocks, such as cellulose, become viable. By-products such as straw or wood chips can be converted to ethanol. Fast growing species like switchgrass can be grown on land not suitable for other cash crops and yield high levels of ethanol per unit area.

Crop

Annual yield (Liters/hectare)

Annual yield (US gal/acre)

Greenhouse-gas savings (% vs. petrol)(1)

Comments

Miscanthus

7300

780

3773

Low-input perennial grass. Ethanol production depends on development of cellulosic technology.

Switchgrass

31007600

330810

3773

Low-input perennial grass. Ethanol production depends on development of cellulosic technology. Breeding efforts underway to increase yields. Higher biomass production possible with mixed species of perennial grasses.

Poplar

37006000

400640

51100

Fast-growing tree. Ethanol production depends on development of cellulosic technology. Completion of genomic sequencing project will aid breeding efforts to increase yields.

Sugar cane

68008000

727870

8796

Long-season annual grass. Used as feedstock for most bioethanol produced in Brazil. Newer processing plants burn residues not used for ethanol to generate electricity. Only grows in tropical and subtropical climates.

Sweet sorghum

25007000

270750

No data

Low-input annual grass. Ethanol production possible using existing technology. Grows in tropical and temperate climates, but highest ethanol yield estimates assume multiple crops per year (only possible in tropical climates). Does not store well.

Corn

31004000

330424

1020

High-input annual grass. Used as feedstock for most bioethanol produced in USA. Only kernels can be processed using available technology; development of commercial cellulosic technology would allow stover to be used and…

Watch the video related to biofuels argentina

Camelina Sativa harvest in Argentina

Help answer the question about biofuels argentina

About Author

qoqo -
About the Author:

I am a professional editor from China Suppliers, and my work is to promote a free online trade platform.
http://www.frbiz.com/ contain a great deal of information about
dog crate wicker , ionic dog brush
welcome to visit!

Ethanol fuel is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

The report delivers an in-depth analysis of biodiesel production and consumption statistics, and estimates the production capacity as well as the region-wise growth rates. An extensive comparison between the bio-diesel and petroleum-diesel consumption has been attempted to showcase the growth prospects of biodiesel market.

The report focuses on the major market trends, estimates and forecasts for the period 2005-2015. It consists of 262 data tables/charts describing market shares, sales forecasts, etc., that gives a deep insight into the growth perspectives of the market. Based on the potential growth exhibited in the recent years, more than 500 companies have identified and 40 key companies were profiled with their contacts. Furthermore, latest key strategic activities (mergers/acquisitions, collaborations/partnerships, product launches/developments) were also reported.

Region-wise, the biodiesel market has been divided into Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Rest of World. Further, the report examines 28 major counties across the regions.

For more information please click on:
http://www.axisresearchmind.com/report-data.php?id=6

Global Market Watch:
World biodiesel market value is expected to reach USD$62 billion by 2015 with a production of 26 billion gallons, supporting a massive CAGR of 26% (2005-2015). Our analysis depicts that Europe will remain as the largest biodiesel market, worldwide, accounting for nearly 70% of the total production during the period. An economic rebound in the US, post-recession, could position North America in the second place among the worlds’ top biodiesel market in 2010 with a growth rate of 12.8%. Asia-Pacific is likely tag as the second fastest growing biodiesel market by 2015, although its growth rate lags behind North America presently. Global biodiesel production capacity was estimated at 14.7 billion gallons in 2009 and expected to grow at a faster rate with fresh participations in the industry in the upcoming years. The biodiesel hubs, Germany and the USA, are estimated to maintain the largest biodiesel production capacities irrespective of the recession impacts and growth forecasts from the Asia-Pacific.

Watch the video related to biodiesel trends

www.taipanfinancialnews.com — Hybrid engines, ethanol, and feedstocks for biodiesel: Jeff Siegel of The Alternative Energy Trader reveals the latest trends in the booming bull market of renewable energy stocks to TFN Smart Trading host Laura Cadden. Paste this link into your browser to have TFN videos like this emailed directly to your inbox each day: www.taipanfinancialnews.com

Help answer the question about biodiesel trends

About Author

Axis Research Mind -
About the Author:

Axis Research Mind market reports are of high-end data analytic solutions, based with industry-specific expertise in innovative sectors such as Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals, Energy and Resources, Food and Beverage, Telecomm etc., to develop customized services to global clients. We provide one-stop solution to our clients which helps capitalize their investments into new markets in the competitive edge of global marketplace, which has a long-term business impact. Our team works in a dynamic way by time efficiencies to provide an extreme data with experienced group of industry analysts, focused to make you succeed.

World biodiesel market value is expected to reach USD$62 billion by 2015 with a production of 26 billion gallons, supporting a massive CAGR of 26% is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

With the emergence of biodiesel as an alternative fuel, many people are curious as to how they can take advantage of it. How can this benefit the average person? In many countries, biodiesel is not yet available at the gas station. This makes it more difficult to obtain it. Therefore, other measures must be taken.

This problem can easily be solved through the use of a biodiesel kit. What is a biodiesel kit, you ask? Quite simply put, it gives you the ability to produce biodiesel from your very own home.

How can this benefit you? There are a number of reasons. One of the most important aspects of biodiesel is that it is better for the environment. If you have kids, you no doubt want to leave them in the best possible scenario. If we totally destroy the planet, what will be left for them?

Another huge factor is the costs involved. Some say that you can make biodiesel for as cheap as $.80 per gallon. Try going down to the local pump now days and getting anything for $.80 per gallon. There’s a good chance they’ll have you committed or arrested. However, this is the reality with biodiesel.

How do you go about getting this magic fuel? Depending on where you live, some countries have it at the gas station. It may cost more there, than you can make it for. A growing segment of the world is starting to make their own biodiesel.

This can be accomplished through a biodiesel kit. These kits can be purchased on the internet or in many different places. With these kits you can stop relying on the fuel companies and start relying on yourself. With gas prices as high as they are, this is becoming extremely attractive to a lot of people.

A new biodiesel kit will probably run you a few thousand dollars. There are several available in the $2000-$3000 range. This may seem like a high start-up cost. However, when you think of the difference between paying nearly $3.00 per gallon and paying $.80 per gallon, it makes sense. It won’t take you very long to recoup those costs.

The kits are not that difficult to use and can change your life. Most come with a water heater and a few other pieces. You must heat the oil up to around 130 degrees in order to process it. Without a water heater, this can be difficult.

Finding a source of vegetable oil to use is important also. Most fast-food restaurants keep the oil and grease out back in a large vat. Many times they will let you take it away for free. It’s important to develop a relationship with the owner. If you do so, you may be getting your gas for next to nothing.

Biodiesel is quickly emerging as a legitimate contender in the oil wars. It may eventually replace fuels as we know them. You might want to investigate how to get on the front end of this trend.

Watch the video related to biodiesel trends

I have changed my mind, since I have found much more information: I no longer believe that global warming is caused mainly by increased carbon dioxide. The planet IS changing temperature in some ways, but its cause is way different from what is being pushed in the media now. Each planet has its own special orbit, tilt, and movment in space, and the earth’s relationship to the sun, and other radiation sources and factors; is varying in cycles – so each planet rises and falls in temperature, in its own special cycle, on its own special timing. (for example, what’s happening on Jupiter or Mars, is not what’s happening on earth.) Humans do not have the power to alter the warming and cooling trends of this planet – it is all about natural cycles that we need to ADAPT TO. Remember, the world has experienced hot and cold ages before, without man causing it (Ice Age, etc). The earth has certainly warmed up since then without the man-introduced carbon to cause it. However, petroleum and coal are both still toxic and nasty, and we need to replace them entirely with green, safe fuels as soon as possible. Amazingly, the super-high cost of fuel now, is increasing interest in developing alternative fuels that are NON-FOOD CROPS, and do not compete with the production of food. Over $4.00 a gallon for fuel, eh? Well THAT factor will have many people working to develop alternative fuels! This is what we’ve been waiting for – petroleum is now offically economically unfeasible. We can get <b>…</b>

Help answer the question about biodiesel trends

The following is what I found in Wikipedia.org:

"Green is used to mean environmentally friendly. For example, green cars are vehicles that have extremely low emissions that are harmful to the environment. The different types of green cars include hybrid, electric, ethanol, biodiesel, natural gas, and high MPG gasoline cars. "

About Author

Joseph Then -
About the Author:

Joseph will share more about Biodiesel as the alternative fuel and you can also learn more about Biodiesel Kit

What is a Biodiesel Kit? is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

With the rising gas prices of today many people have begun to look for an alternative way to put fuel in their cars. A biodiesel kit fits the bill for many people who have started making this oil saving fuel in their own backyards. And why not make your own fuel, the hit to wallets and bank accounts with high gasoline prices makes finding alternative fuel sources imperative these days, particularly with the price of gas and oil in the news on a daily basis.

A biodiesel kit is a great way to save a substantial amount of money on your fuel costs. The basic function of such a kit is to convert vegetable oil into biodiesel, a fuel source that can be used in vehicles that currently run on diesel fuel. It is important to note that not all car companies endorse the use of biodiesel fuel in their vehicles and will void the warranty if an engine is damaged by its use. Be sure to research this before buying a new vehicle with a diesel engine. For older diesel cars and trucks there are engine conversion kits that will make the change to cleaner burning biodiesel much easier.

There is a minimal amount of supplies needed to use a biodiesel kit. You will need basic tap water, methanol and access to a good amount of vegetable oil, which can usually be obtained from restaurants and such. You can set the kit up just about anywhere, although most people do put them outside in a shed or under an overhang. You will be making a fuel oil so setting up in the house may not be a real good idea.

When it comes to pricing a kit the more features to be found the more expensive the kit. The most expensive models are built to prevent fumes and odors from escaping during the refining process. Having an odorless refining process may be important for those wishing to refine their fuel near their home. If you live on a farm or a large acreage this may not be as important as the kit can be located farther from the house. Of course if you can afford it go ahead and get the more expensive closed system just because they are very easy to use.

If for some reason you already have a large amount of cooking oil that you need to dispose of then a biodiesel kit would work perfectly. It does take more time to process used oil but the results are the same, a more environmentally friendly fuel that can be put into a diesel powered vehicle.

Considering that the price of gasoline is on an ever rising trend making biodiesel for personal use can be seen as a smart move. Having your own biodiesel kit producing a constant supply of a low cost environmentally friendly fuel right in your own backyard would remove the sting of high pump prices.

Watch the video related to biodiesel trends

Richard from Sydney explains why he thinks alternative fuel sources will be big in 2007.

Help answer the question about biodiesel trends

About Author

Andrew Bicknell -
About the Author:

Do you want to know more about
biodiesel kits and the fuel they make? Click here and find out all about biodiesel.

Save Money with a Biodiesel Kit is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

The topic of renewable energy has been widely discussed in recent years. Indeed, as fossil fuel supplies continue to dwindle and high energy prices are maintained, people are realising the advantages of finding alternative sources of energy. Not only that, but in light of the detrimental effects of burning fossil fuels – coal, oil and natural gas – there are increasing efforts to explore more environmentally-friendly options.

Currently, there’s a worrying amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) being released into the world’s atmosphere. This, say many scientists, is significantly contributing to climate change and global warming. In order to protect the earth from further damage, therefore, people are looking for new, greener sources of electricity and gas, as well as ways to reduce overall energy consumption.

According to research, more than 40 percent of the UK’s man-made CO2 emissions come from the energy people use in their homes and for travel. As a result, there are many new initiatives aimed at encouraging people to personally embrace greener technology and to limit the amount of energy they use in their properties.

Generally speaking, there are two main types of renewable energy available that can be used at home: solar and wind. Solar power, which converts the sun’s natural energy into electricity and heat, is the most popular form of renewable energy and can be relatively easily installed in domestic properties. Not only does it provide people with environmentally-friendly, or green energy, but it also helps to save on bills.

Wind power is also an established form of green power and again can be employed in the home. Basically channelling the power of the wind through the use of mini wind turbines, electricity is generated, which is then fed into the property’s electricity supply. Producing energy in this way is great for the environment and it’s even possible to sell back any excess energy to the power companies: this is also true for surplus solar energy.

If it’s too expensive to install such equipment, it’s always possible to switch to a green energy plan or tariff. There are various options available, such as an energy match, whereby power companies will match each normal unit of electricity used in the home by feeding a unit of renewable energy into the National Power Grid. They may also fund renewable energy projects.

Additionally, there’s a lot that people can do at home, both to conserve energy and to save money. For example, if everyone in Britain with gas or oil central heating installed a condensing boiler with heating controls, it would be possible to save up to 6.7 million tonnes of CO2 from being emitted into the atmosphere annually.

With a bit of thought, everyone can help in the fight against climate change. Embracing renewable energy is a great way to start, as is reducing the amount of gas and electricity being used in the home. And, thinking about this issue now will not only help the environment, but also make a difference to utility bills.

Watch the video related to Green Energy

EZGasSavers.com

Help answer the question about Green Energy

About Author

Adam Singleton -
About the Author:

Adam Singleton writes for a digital marketing agency. This article has been commissioned by a client of said agency. This article is not designed to promote, but should be considered professional content.

Renewable Energy and You is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

A biodiesel car is all the rage in today’s environment conscious society, thanks to the awareness being raised by various advocates coming from all walks of life. Practically any automobile that runs on petro-diesel is an ideal candidate for biodiesel use.

Remember, cars that operate on regular diesel and those that use biodiesel function on the same principles. Ergo, a bio-car is pretty much like any other diesel-powered vehicle except for one teeny tiny detail, it is earth-friendly. Small difference, isn’t it?

Biodiesel: The Scientific Approach

Science dictates that hydrocarbons play a crucial role in the production of fuel. And as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, a car with petrol-based fuel is similar to any other vehicle due to the manner of how their engines operate and that is the process of internal combustion. 

Fuel compound like gasoline or diesel, when used as a fuel source, relies much on the process of combustion at varying temperatures. Since the dawn of cars, gasoline has been the favorite because of its ability ignite at fairly low temperatures. You only need a spark, that is it. Generally, a gasoline powered vehicle creates powerkick through the combo of vapor and oxygen, which is injected and explodes into the combustion chamber. Thus, making the piston turn the crankshaft that is distributed to the transmission and to the screeching tires.

Petro-Diesel Vs. Biodiesel

In an engine that runs on diesel, combustion is triggered by heat originating from compression. In here, the diesel fuel burns due to rapid compression. The downside is that diesel engines produce more nasty and noxious gases. One is carbon dioxide and the other is sulfur dioxide, not to mention nitrogen oxide and the list goes on.

By using biodiesel, you can take off the noxious gases from the equation and you have an environmentally-friendly vehicle.

The Repercussions of Petro-Diesel

Acid rain and green house effect, these two are rooted from the gases emitted by a car running on petro-diesel. Have you forgotten the high cost of gas nowadays? Talk about daylight robbery. The congestion in our highways may have subsided but our dependency on foreign oil providers may have just become a little tighter and a tad bit severe.

Biodiesel Equipment: Diminishing Harmful Gases

As for the bio-powered car, it functions like a petro-diesel vehicle devoid of the drawbacks. Some individuals opt to use B20 or mixture of twenty percent biodiesel to eighty percent regular diesel. This increases the mixture volatility while lessening the quantity of petrol used. And do not forget the absence of any fuel system modification.

Issues On Biodiesel

With the physical characteristics of biodiesel, it requires a higher temperature for it to burn and release power. That is why there are various ratios that can address this concern. A little tweaking in the engine plus a bit of help coming from heating coils then you are ready to drive.

Making your own alternative fuel may demand that you purchase biodiesel processors and kits. A regular kit can make a few gallons of biodiesel. But if you want to make more than a few gallons, you might need a biodiesel expansion kit. 

Today, it is better to have biodiesel processors producing non-toxic fuel rather than visiting a gasoline station and filling you car with environmentally degrading liquid.

Watch the video related to biodiesel equipment

Biodiesel Logic “Your source for Biodiesel Processors & Biodiesel Equipment”

Help answer the question about biodiesel equipment

About Author

Joseph Long -
About the Author:

Visit our website to learn more about biodiesel and biodiesel processors.

Biodiesel Information is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy

Any Western grown-up who’s lived in a snowy area will know the feeling of sitting with the family around a big, warm fireplace. We remember not just the relief from the cold provided, but the smell of the wood burning, and the sounds of the crackling and pops. But nowadays, with a great increase in environmental awareness, the idea of burning trees, one of nature’s most important resources, simply to keep ourselves warm seems outdated and environmentally unsound.

There’s never been a time previously in history when man has exploited nature to the extent being done now. And trees are at the forefront of nature’s gifts that are being used. Despite the increased used of email in our lives, the production of paper is still at extremely high levels in everything from junk food wrappers to junk mail. With all of this going on, it can seem like needless extravagance to have a fireplace using this resource as well.

But at the same time, would we want to deny our children the happy memories we had of getting warmth from a fire? Air conditioners don’t provide the same kind of ambience in a room, and aren’t great for the environment in themselves. Fortunately, there are other kinds of fuels we can use in a fireplace that don’t require the burning of logs. We can use artificial logs along with alternative fuels, and also recreate the smell we remember from artificial sources.

Ventless fireplaces have been around for a while and are gradually increasing popularity. “Ventless” means, essentially, these fireplaces don’t require chimneys. It’s possible for these fireplaces to burn propane gas, natural gas or gel fuel. These fireplaces are equipped with logs that look realistic, and generally don’t cost a lot to operate and maintain. A freestanding ventless fireplace will generally cost somewhere beginning at five hundred dollars. If you want to upgrade your vented fireplace with a propane or gas insert, it’s possible. This installation usually won’t be too expensive, but must be done by a trained professional.

These gases still have their negative environmental impacts, however. So if you’re extremely environmentally conscious, you can take the next step and purchase a fireplace that burns biofuels. These can either be bought new, or a fitting can be made into your existing fireplace. The great thing about biofuels is that there is no smoke produced, so you can have them around people with allergies without triggering any symptoms. They can even be bought in models that can be mounted on a wall.

Biofuels are produced not from trees, but agricultural crops. They are forty percent more efficient than gas, with a liter of biofuel lasting up to five hours. The biofuels give off steam and release a small amount of carbon dioxide, but not enough to have a significant effect on the creation of greenhouse gases. While these benefits are great, there is an increased cost compared to other gases, and the fireplace itself is more expensive. You can order twelve months of biofuel gas, twelve litres a month, for a little over one hundred dollars per month.

Watch the video related to biofuel equipment

www.70centsagallon.com What is Biodiesel Fuel You Ask? Learn More about Biodiesel right now! Biodiesel 101 Find out More about biodiesel biofuel techniques and technology to stay ahead of the renewable energy learning curve at the most comprehensive location on the net! Biodiesel 101-Library.

Help answer the question about biofuel equipment

About Author

Wes Fernley -
About the Author:

Pureflame is a leader in
ethanol fireplace
and
ethanol biofuel
products. They offer the highest quality biofuels and contemporary fireplaces available on the market today.

Using Ventless Fireplaces to Keep Your House Warm is a post from: American Biodiesel Energy